1. #1
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Longley, Huddersfield, UK
    Age
    54
    Posts
    817

    Default Adding Detail Without Adding Triangles

    Increasing mesh resolution in specific areas of a model will normally introduce triangles at the low res/ high res interface, but if you squeeze a quad poly into your poly loop diagonally you can add two more columns of polygons, without adding any triangles.

    Sadly I don`t know any way to do this in Z-Brush. It possibly can be done, using the point welding option in the object import panel creatively, but really this sort of mesh editing is best done in a traditional 3D package.

    Hope this helps some people a bit.

    Cheers,

    R

    PolyInsert01.jpg

  2. #2

    Default

    I don't get it
    Any better example?

  3. #3
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Longley, Huddersfield, UK
    Age
    54
    Posts
    817

    Default

    Imagine that the four black polygons are part of an edge loop on the end of your model`s hand. You want to introduce more mesh detail to the hand area without adding triangles. You can do this by inserting a quad poly into the next extruded edge loop, sticking it in on a diagonal, so it looks like a diamond. The next edge loop set of polys you extrude from this new raw edge will have two more columns of polygons than the original (black) loop had.

    Any clearer?

    R

  4. #4
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    south africa
    Posts
    190

    Default

    yep makes sense to me ,now just to put it to practice!

    thanks
    Does the moon actually possess such, strange powers or is it all just,....lunacy?

  5. #5
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Manhattan, New Yotk
    Posts
    4,494

    Default

    But you still end up with a three and a five edge pole vertex which can make shading a challenge again.... Quad's around there are most likely not to stay coplanar. Darn triangles.... There is no free lunch....

    Yesterday I tried to intersect two cylinders and tried to bevel the intersection to make it look smooth. That's where you end up in polygon hell...

    Lemo
    Last edited by lemonnado; 12-08-06 at 05:56 AM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    the netherlands
    Age
    64
    Posts
    3,550

    Default

    Hahaha, Lemonnado, I know too where polygon hell is :-)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Verona, New Jersey
    Posts
    196

    Default

    I too have had my ass burned by the flames of aforementioned poly-Hell. I doubt it's the last time...

  8. #8
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    the netherlands
    Age
    64
    Posts
    3,550

    Default

    As far as I know we cannot split a row of polygons without getting a tri. Only after dividing the tri is gone.

  9. #9
    Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney NSW Australia
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Actually, a 5 sided polygon is better than a single triangle. It smooths accurately when subdivided, wheras a triangle produces pinching.


    Example:
    topolies.gif
    Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    166

    Default

    if that's the case, why not just keep things quads?


  11. #11
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Too bad that Zbrush does not support 5 sided polygons - it'll insert an edge and convert it to a quad and a triangle.

    Besides, any N-sided polygon can be removed by converting it to N quad polygons and adding some geometry to the entire mesh. The result will be a bit more dense, but in our experience it works quite well. Or a carefully placed triangle also works in some cases.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The 'Internet' baby! What wonderful scenery! And the realestate is still cheap...
    Age
    52
    Posts
    4,015

    Default

    I've never understood the idea of adding a triangle, when you know it causes issues. Quads are by far more efficient on the whole. I've never been a lover of polys until Zbrush came along and it does such wonderful quads. I would however like to hear explanations on why a triangle is ever necessary.
    Jason Belec
    Kiss Your Sister Studios... YEAUCH

    Eternal Zsphere thread : 'Origins' begins... : Liquid Maya

    Jason can be reached at Cowboy Feng's Spacebar and Grill. If you know where it is, you are indeed privileged. It's your round.

    'Obey me! I am ROOT!'

  13. #13
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Longley, Huddersfield, UK
    Age
    54
    Posts
    817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Belec
    I've never understood the idea of adding a triangle, when you know it causes issues.
    Absolutely! Which is why I posted this tutorial to show how one can increase local mesh density without introducing the hated triangles. I didn`t invent this procedure; I`m just gratefully passing it on to anyone here who feels it could help them.

    R

  14. #14
    Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney NSW Australia
    Posts
    80

    Default

    if that's the case, why not just keep things quads?
    Because when your working with a budget of polygons for a low poly model adding 6 rows of polygons may be too much.

    The purpose of the excersize as I understood it was to add one extra row of polys at the bottom half.

    Cheers,
    Paul W.
    Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Follow User Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by subspark
    Because when your working with a budget of polygons for a low poly model adding 6 rows of polygons may be too much.

    The purpose of the excersize as I understood it was to add one extra row of polys at the bottom half.

    Cheers,
    Paul W.
    I was under the impression that ngons were problematic for animation perposes as well as problems with rendering and striping in videogames so in that case you would use triangles in areas that you can hide.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •